Man is purely a social animal. That’s one thing social networks love to exploit. As they say, we want to stay connected at an instinctive level.
Mark Zuckerberg has created such an addictive platform which lures us again and again. We fill it with every nuisance we can. The concept which was born in the quiet rooms of Harvard is now the most used social networking service.
Google has now entered the arena with Google+, but why does it need to?
Google was fine without a social networking service wasn’t’ it?
Well, the answer is no!. Comscore provides us with some staggering stats.
Online video is exploding, with annual user growth of more than 45 percent. Mobile-device time spent increased 28 percent last year — with average smartphone time spent doubling. And social networks are now used by 90 percent of U.S. Internet users — for an average of more than four hours a month.
None of this is a newsflash. Every venture capitalist, Web publisher, and digital marketer is hyper-aware of these three trends. But what is happening to the rest of the non-social web?
If we exclude just Facebook from these stats, the consumption in terms of minutes of use decrease nearly nine percent between March 2010 and March 2011.
Now considering that the usage of Facebook increased over 69% over the same period, it won’t be wrong to say that Facebook is absorbing the usage minutes from whole of the non-social web.
The rest of the non social web is also called the ‘searchable’ web. Which is becoming less relevant. Making Google less relevant too. And Google is really nervous about that.
Facebook has locked Google out of it. All the shares, likes, names, status or any other data is not searchable by Google. Unlike twitter, which had a deal with Google for it’s ‘real-time’ search. The deal recently ended and the Google ‘real-time search’ page mysteriously disappeared without any explanation from the side of Google.
The Ideology Change
Web was nothing but just a bunch of ‘documents’ connected through hyperlinks until a geek of Harvard changed the whole paradigm. Now the word ‘connected’ means something else. Facebook connects people, not pages.
Google still works through searching the keywords. They see the ‘documents’ as the basic entity of web unlike Facebook and twitter where ‘people’ are the basic entity. Google has to embrace a whole new ideology for this new business. Applying the previous brute force cannot be of any help.
Anyone who had to make himself or his company famous had to play the Google’s game. SEO and all that stuff, being over obsessed with keyword. A whole math and algorithm driven approach. Now, it’s more of a common sense which makes you well connected with your target audience.
Its not the collision of two giant companies, it’s the ideologies clashing.
However, Google+ is getting positive feedback mostly by now, though it ran out of disk space and spammed user by it’s notification recently.It’ll take time to sort out the bugs. Thankfully for Google, Facebook has one major flaw – It’s privacy policies. It has always been in news due to this concern. And Google can use this well, to wipe out the embarrassment of failure of Orkut and Google Buzz.
I may be wrong, but one thing is sure – There is no parallel existence here. One of them will thrive and other will go and meet other failed league of MySpace or some even more miserable names like Yahoo Buzz or ‘ConnectU’ which failed even before anyone could hear their names. Only time can tell. but jokes apart IMHO whichever lets you stalk your ex-girlfriend efficiently – Wins!


